Dlouho nikdo nic nevlozil trades are live/5 min es/ RRR at least 1:1

jeste k tomu co napsal Taraka ,ze je třeba mít jasně definováno, co je maximální velikost pozice a ztráta z ní a a za ní obchod automaticky zavírat davam prednost analyze pred striktnim automatickym uzaviranim pozice na definovanem SL, ano jiste mam nejakou hranici ztraty, ale pokud context neukazal jinak, fixed SL snizuje uspesnost obchodu.

scale in pouzivam neustale a % uspesnosti obchodu + 80 %, coz pokud neuzaviram na BE scale position, tak vice nez offset large SL. Dnes ukazka nejhorsich prurazu AI, but context against it.

hi papo33, samozdrejme, ze H2,L2 neni vzdy DT,DB snazil jsem se ti dat priklad toho jak H2 muze mit smysl v kontextu napriklad DT,DB A u large SL jsem se snazil reagovat na tvoji poznamku, ze intradenni obchodovani je extremne tezke, v pripade, ze trader pouziva maly stop loss. Prosim nesnaz se me chytat za slovo Brooks studuji od roku 2009 a muj nick na brooks price action je uk_trader Stop loss musi davat smysl a bavit se detailne bez chart o SL u 40% obchodech ci o sl u 70% obchodech asi sam usoudis nema smysl. Tak jako nema smysl bavit se o failed H2 pokud je leg in micro channel ty ho vezmes a trh te vytukne na SL, ktery si umistil pod signal bar, protoze nechces riskovat u 40 % obchodu vzdalenejsi SL a nedokaze scale in, ci pockat si na 2nd entry atd......, Proste jsou situace kdy to bude fungovat a kdy to fungovat nebude a tvojim ukolem je posoudit pro vziti obchodu ci wait for 2nd entry a nebo obchod nevzit a pockat si na BO-PB. Za jak dlouho si precetl Brooks knizky (nesnazim se te nachytat, jenom mi prijde, ze se tady trochu bavime jak se rika ty o voze a ja o koze :)

Take jsem pocitoval waste of time replying to such a comment, but luckily en takes half of cz time.

ja se nedivim tvemu komentari Honza K., ale divim se komentari papo3 po precteni 2x vsech 3 Brooks knizek + vzhlednuti videi Dobrou

Remember, there is something difficult about every trade, but traders who understand the difficulty can see the opportunity that it presents. Al Brooks - Reversals- The Best Trades-page 473

to papo 33 Brooks is using large SL, scales in and does not let innitial SL to be hit, majority of times he scalps, his edge is his experience of reading price and I can understand why its difficult to call trades live (at least thats what he says), I am not sure how you can actually capture this approach in mechanical statistics. There are too many variable which you would have to consider. Lets say you wanna take statistics on H2, are you going to take statistics of MTL, AI, too s strongly down, TTRD or TD etc., well I guess its possible H2 is actually DB, which is S/R area, but without more info (context) difficult to make money. It seems to me like you have tried live trading and listened Al at the same time and lost money on it. H 1,2,3,4 without more info is not profitable and actually nothing is profitable unless used in right context with correct MM and trade management. I am surprise you use term "Čísla pravdepodobnosti hádže ako z rukáva" after all time you spent reading his books you should know better than anyone else, its market character, which determines the probability of the entry and its never certain when you make judgment of trade probability and when you are not certain assume its 50% market. You are saying his system is complicated. Yes it has to be complicated as price action, constantly gravitates to 50 % probability and you see reasons for long and short and edge is breathe imbalance in surge for the balance . I do not feel from what you wrote you actually given good enough reasons to consider understanding Al Brooks functionless.

yes 4 be test and best trade of the day :)

to detroit: delal si nejake vypocty na spatne follow through of entry bar and good follow through of entry bar ? Podle toho, co si sem dal, tak se snazis obchod uzavrit pokud entry bar neni in direction of the trade or is doji or reversal, not sure which one? Coz je chytre, protoze pokud ma obchod RR 1:2 a ty beres 40 % obchody ( z prumerovano s tvoji netrpelivosti) tak si nemuzes dovolit mit zasahnut 2x SL, protoze na 3 ziskovem obchode by si skoncil na be. nevyhoda low % trade is cherry picking, more stress, less time for decision I personally think you should try to add limit order trades in area where you take stop trades as you are capable to analyze context. Dalsi vec vsimni si, jestli tve vstupy a netrpelivost neovlinuje to co al rika. Stavalo se mi, ze al napriklad rekl zitra je 70% pravdepodobnost 2 legs correction up/sideway a ja samou netrpelivosti zapominal na dulezite details samotne price action. Ano trh udelal presne to co al rekl, ale napriklad az po dalsim otestovani low.

diky detroit, ze sem davas sve screen shots Musim si pichnout tve obchody by dobre fungovali s moji poznamkou, ze cim min toho mas tak tim vetsi SL potrebujes a jeste lip s tvoji poznamkou,ze Kdyz je setup weak, nelze od nej cekat homerun. with low probability trades you can not cherry pick to jsi zvladl perfektne, vzal jsi vsechny Asi sam vidis, ze jsi bral stop orders in limit order markets. Tak trochu jsi byl pozde na limit order party jak s prichodem tak s odchodem. Kazdy z tech obchodu, te mohl vytuknout na posunutem sl a pak se rozjet, bez tebe. Naprosto chapu tvuj pristup dat sanci obchodu se rozjet a pokud se nerozjede tak nenechat zasahnout SL a vypadnout z obchodu za lepsi cenu nez sl. Udelal jsi to u prvniho obchodu, druheho obchodu, 3 obchodu a pokud by trh neudelal velikou bull bar tak by jsi to udelal i u ctvrteho. A ted mi rekni jak by si se citil, kdyby te trh u ctvrteho obchodu vytuknul a pak se rozjel bez tebe?

Ja zase cim vic mi toho chybi, tim mensi target. Kdyz je setup weak, nelze od nej cekat homerun. Ostatne muj prvni dnesni obchod byl perfektni priklad "weak setup" - mohl jsem inkasovat PT na urovni RRR 1:1 a byt v pohode, ale sel jsem pro 1.5 nasobek SL a to se pak vymstilo (hlavne psychicky). Takze to jsem mirne nezvladl, ale aspon ze jsem nenechal zasahnout initial stop loss! Ano napsal jsi to lepe:) the probability changes constantly

vcera jsem neobchodoval na konci seance je to vzdycky jednoduche videt tvuj short stop entry - bull channel X (yes weak as every new high TTR) - previous 3 PB bought above MA X (yes possible wedge) - no previous significant bear pressure in tight bull channel X (yes possibility for doji day) - doji bull signal bar within 5 bar tight Trading range - Pokud bych vzal tento obchod, kde weak signal bar, previous buyers at MA a no significant sell pressure breaking TL, tak hledam vzdalenejsi SL a pridavam pozice, ale proti tomu hral cas. Mam pravidlo, ze cim vic mi toho chybi tim vzdalenejsi SL potrebuji k vylepseni % a tim narocnejsi obchod. Podle me hlavni chyba tohoto obchodu bylo stop order a tight SL Ta doji bull bar mela byt sell close, coz jak vidime vsichni udelalia a vzali % at MA Podle me to nebyl 50 % obchod na stop entry. Tak troche podobny obchod jako predevcirem. Al casto mluvi o tom jak musi scale in, aby si vylepsil % coz dela kdyz si je jisty contextem ale stop order by mu na % nepridalo a proto to nedela ke konci. Tve posledni 2 obchody mi prijdou podobne, contex tam je ale oproti Al vstupujes na stop order a pouzivas pevny SL. Samozdrejme tu nejsme od toho abychom nekoho kopirovali, ale ucili se.

nevedel jsem o nich, diky kouknu na to Muzes sem hodit ze 5 obchodu 2 Bottom/top=H/L rejection, ktere ted testujes losers and 5 winners with simillar setup? pls